I don’t remember the first time I saw the actor Tom Hardy on the big screen.
After consulting imdb.com, I’m tempted to say it was for supporting roles in either Star Trek: Nemesis or Marie Antoinette. But after Inception, I knew his name.
And after This Means War, the action rom-com with Reese Witherspoon and Chris Pine, I liked him.
But after seeing the pics of Tom with his dog at the London premiere of his new film Legend, our relationship is taking a turn for the serious.
He brought this dog to the red carpet.
I think I’m in love.
Posted in Celebrities, Dogs, Entertainment, Humor, Love, Movies, Relationships
Tagged actor, celebrities, chris pine, comedy, Dogs, entertainment, good boy, Humor, imdb.com, Inception, London, love, marie antoinette, movie premiere, Movies, red carpet, Reese Witherspoon, Relationships, Star Trek, This Means War movie, Tom Hardy
One of the first movies that kept me up at night was a version of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein that I saw during my grade school years on a late night ‘creature feature.’
I’ve searched IMDB.com to no avail, trying to locate the specific retelling. But I do have a memory of the final scenes — Dr. Frankenstein destroying himself and his monster. And the monster says, “Well done, master.”
No wonder I had nightmares.
There’s yet another remake of the classic story, starring James McAvoy and Daniel Radcliffe, coming out at Thanksgiving time .
This one looks like as much fun as fright. I’m in!
Posted in Celebrities, Commentary, Entertainment, Humor, Movies
Tagged celebrities, commentary, creature feature, Daniel Radcliffe, Dr. Frankenstein, entertainment, Frankenstein, Frankenstein's monster, fright, horror, Humor, imdb.com, James McAvoy, late night, Mary Shelley, master, monster, monster mash, movie remake, movie trailer, Movies, nightmares
I passed this delivery truck in my neighborhood yesterday afternoon. The service is new to me, but the name is a classic.
Can it really be over 30 years now — 1981 in fact — since Dudley Moore burst onto the scene in the comedy classic Arthur, with Sir John Gielgud at his side as his loyal, oh-so-proper manservant Hobson?
Even he might approve of the logo’s jaunty cap and just-so tie.
The driver of the delivery van was very young. I couldn’t help but wonder — does he even understand the reference for the company name?
Perhaps he is more familiar with the cringeworthy 2011 movie version of Arthur where Helen Mirren portrayed Hobson in a bit of gender-bending casting. If so, he is probably confused by the logo. (Helen didn’t wear a hat.)
And thinks the movie was awful.
Posted in Cars, Celebrities, Design, Entertainment, Humor, Life, Movies
Tagged advertising, Arthur movie, Butler, cap, cars, celebrities, company name, delivery, delivery truck, design, driver, driving, Dudley Moore, entertainment, gender bending, hat, Helen Mirren, Hobson, Humor, I'll alert the media, imdb.com, life, manservant, Movies, New York City, nostalgia, origin, Russell Brand, servant, Sir John Gielgud, Upper West Side, van
I watched The Terminator during lunch yesterday.
The movie is almost 30 years old, but certain things still hold up.
1. Arnold is scary. When he forces his way into Sarah Connor’s home and kills her roommate and boyfriend, that still totally freaks me out. I can remember coming back to my apartment after seeing The Terminator in 1984 in the movie theatre and lying in bed, mapping out my escape route if a cyborg broke in.
We’re talking sleepless nights, people.
2. Michael Biehn (Kyle Reece) is hot. He comes back from the future to save Sarah Connor, so he’s already a good guy…and then we all know what happens next. (Cue the sexy music.) But here’s a tip — don’t go looking at his current photo on imdb.com like I did.
It has been 30 years, after all.
3. Linda Hamilton has bad hair. I’m pretty sure I thought that at the time as well. And I really think it now. We’re talking serious helmet head. But she is the mother of John Connor, who saves the planet…
So I will cut her some slack.
Posted in Academy Awards, Commentary, Entertainment, Humor, Movies
Tagged Arnold Schwarzenegger, commentary, cyborg, entertainment, helmet head, Humor, imdb.com, John Connor, Kyle Reece, life, Linda Hamilton, Michael Biehn, movie theatre, Movies, Sarah Connor, sci-fi, sexy music, The Terminator
I’ve been working all morning in a very small, windowless room, and when I finally came up for air, what headline greeted me?
Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal Are Dating
Wow…how long was I in there?
These two seems words apart to me, but when I looked it up on imdb.com, it turns out Taylor is 21 and Jake’s only 30. Still…she seems like a really young 21, and he is kinda old for his years.
So where does that net out? Taylor’s practically dating her dad….or someone who could be her dad in the mental sense. Still, Jake is probably a whole lot better looking than her dad. (Just guessing…never seen the man.)
But why would Jake date Taylor? She is the total antithesis of Reese Witherspoon, his last great love. Reese is the divorced mother of two kids, and from all reports, Jake was super serious.
The perfect antidote? Date a young blond thing that is so far from marriage or thoughts of a serious relationship that you’re guaranteed a fairly stress-free good time.
And it’s shouldn’t strain on your brain, either.
Of course, that’s assuming the reports are even true. They were sighted together at “Saturday Night Live;” in Brooklyn near Maggie Gyllenhaal’s home; and out together for Sunday brunch. Sounds like something-something to me!
Oh well, back into the windowless room. No doubt they’ll both be dating someone else by the time I come out.
Posted in Celebrities, Commentary, Entertainment, Humor, Internet, Life, Movies, News, Relationships, Television, TV
Tagged celebrities, celebrities dating, celebrity gossip, commentary, entertainment, gossip, Humor, imdb.com, Internet, Jake Gyllenhaal, life, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Movies, news, newsheadline, Reese Witherspoon, Relationships, Saturday Night Live, Taylor Swift, Television, TV
How long would you last off the grid? Your Internet connection wiped. No texting, no Facebook, no tweeting, no, no…
Sorry. Things started to go a bit dark there for a minute.
Last night’s episode of “Modern Family” posed the question as an intra-family competition, which ended up lasting two short, very difficult days for the Dunphy family. (Phil won. Then it turned out his oldest daughter tricked him, and that she actually won. If you didn’t see it, well my goodness, why not??)
Two days off line? I wouldn’t last that long.
Heck, to write this blog entry alone, I had six browser windows open — WordPress, Facebook, AOL, Twitter, NYTimes.com and Google. Plus, I had my Palm Pre at my side. And I was watching television and Skyping with my sister.
Off the grid? More like off the charts.
I can’t remember the last time I sat down and simply watched TV. Tweeting and checking Facebook have become a natural part of the experience. See an actor that you don’t recognize? Look them up on imdb.com. Hear a funny line? Post it on Facebook…or share it via an open chat window on AIM.
Sitting back and passively enjoying entertainment is a thing of the past. Interacting with that TV show or movie or Youtube video — that’s the norm today. And the thought of even 48 hours without that option gives me the willies.
So, cheer up, Phil. Your daughter might have pulled a fast one on you, but you would have kicked my butt at this bet (if I had the guts to enter in the first place).
Did you know…Larry Page and Sergey Brin, who met while at Stanford University and collaborated on the Google web search engine, originally called it “BackRub” ? Snazzy.
Posted in Blogging, Entertainment, Family, Humor, Internet, Technology, Television, TV
Tagged AOL, blog, blogging, browser window, Dunphy family, entertainment, Facebook, family, Google, Humor, imdb.com, Internet, Modern Family tv show, NYTimes.com, off the grid, Palm Pre, Phil Dunphy, Skype, technology, Television, texting, TV, tweeting, Twitter, Wordpress